/TASK MANAGEMENT

MAKING HIGH-STAKES WORK EASIER TO FIND, UNDERSTAND AND COMPLETE

A redesign of in-system task management for an aviation and engineering-focused quality management platform. The work brought workload discovery, filtering and common actions into one coherent experience while aligning the product with the company’s standardised UI platform.

< RETURN
Task management design exploration showing workload, navigation, filters and quick actions
PRODUCT
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
ROLE
SENIOR UX DESIGNER
TIMELINE
3 MONTHS
SKILLS
RESEARCH, DESIGN & PROTOTYPING

/THE USER

AS AQUALITY MANAGER
I WANTTO SEE WHICH TASKS NEED MY ATTENTION
SO THATWORK IS COMPLETED ON TIME AND TO THE REQUIRED STANDARD

Quality managers work across several processes at once. They need to spot what is urgent, understand what is expected and act with confidence, often without having time to relearn the interface for every task type.


/THE CHALLENGE

The existing workload contained the information users needed, but its hierarchy and interaction patterns made that information harder to use. Tasks from different modules behaved differently, filtering was limited and common actions often required a trip into the full record.

THE SAME WORKLOAD, WITH A CLEARER JOB TO DO

The redesign keeps the operational detail but changes how it is organised. Categories, controls and status information now follow the shared product language, making the page easier to scan before a user opens anything.

Redesigned task workloadORIGINALNEW

/RESEARCH

The design exploration started with the current workload and the repeated task patterns already present across the product. This kept the focus on real points of friction and identified where one shared interaction could replace several slightly different ones.

01

WORKLOAD REVIEW

Compared the existing workload with the shared UI patterns to identify where hierarchy, controls and system feedback had drifted apart.

02

TASK MAPPING

Grouped repeated actions across CAPA, audits, documents and other controlled workflows to find patterns that could be solved once and reused.

03

ACTION REVIEW

Looked at the information needed to make approval and stage decisions, then separated useful context from the navigation that slowed users down.


/THE SOLUTION

The proposal created a consistent route from finding work to completing it. The workload became the shared starting point, filtering stayed visible and common actions moved into focused side panels that preserved the user’s place.


/LEARNINGS

Task management works best as a product-wide model, not a collection of module-specific shortcuts. Reusing workload, filtering and action patterns reduces what users need to learn.

Speed matters, but context matters more. The strongest improvements removed navigation while keeping the information and safeguards needed to make a confident decision.

Empty states, warnings and confirmations are part of the task flow. Treating them as designed moments makes the system easier to trust when the work is regulated.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

DATED USER INTERFACETHE CHALLENGE

The existing workload had accumulated dense tables, competing controls and visual patterns from different parts of the platform. Users could find the information, but scanning it quickly took more effort than it should have.

This was not simply a reskin. The redesign needed to preserve the operational detail quality teams rely on while introducing the hierarchy and interaction language of the standardised UI platform.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

LIMITED SORTING & FILTERINGTHE CHALLENGE

Tasks from CAPA, audits, documents and other modules appeared together, but users had limited ways to narrow the list or understand which filters were active.

No-result and empty states also provided little guidance. Once a search went nowhere, getting back to useful work involved more trial and error than anyone needs from enterprise software.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

ACTIONS HIDDEN IN RECORDSTHE CHALLENGE

The workload could tell users that something needed attention, but completing a common action often meant leaving the list, opening the full record and finding the correct stage or document screen.

That journey interrupted triage and made a focused decision feel like a tour of the product. The opportunity was to bring the action closer without removing the context or safeguards behind it.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

INCONSISTENT FEEDBACKTHE CHALLENGE

Confirmation, warning and status patterns varied between task types. After an action, it was not always obvious whether the system had accepted the change, needed more information or had been updated by someone else.

In a regulated workflow, ambiguity is expensive. Feedback needed to be consistent enough to recognise immediately and specific enough to support the next decision.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

01 / WORKLOAD & FILTERINGPRIORITY WITHOUT THE GUESSWORK

Related task types are presented through one consistent table. Stronger hierarchy makes titles, ownership and due dates easier to scan, while search and filters sit directly beside the list they affect.

Applied filters remain visible and easy to remove. Empty and no-result states explain what happened and give users a clear route back.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

02 / QUICK ACTIONSACT WITHOUT LOSING YOUR PLACE

Document and stage actions use a shared side-panel pattern. Users can review the information needed for a decision, add comments and complete the task while the workload remains visible behind the panel.

The pattern removes unnecessary navigation while keeping required information, approval states and confirmation steps clear.

/TASK MANAGEMENT

03 / FEEDBACKMAKE THE SYSTEM'S RESPONSE OBVIOUS

Consistent status chips, warnings and confirmation banners help users understand what happened after an action.

The same visual language is used across task types so success, missing information and concurrent changes are easier to recognise.